Cart abandonment statistics

Why shoppers leave before paying. Where to look for avoidable friction.

Teal hoodie in a shopping basket at an apparel store checkout.

Cart abandonment is common, but the reasons matter more than a single pooled rate. Cost, account creation, delivery and payment friction point to different fixes; recovery-message revenue measures only identified recipients.

Key takeaways

  1. A cart is not always a ready buyer: 42% of US shoppers reported abandoning because they were browsing or not ready to purchase. [7]

  2. Show total costs and delivery early. In Baymard's reason survey excluding just-browsing abandoners, 40% cited extra costs and 20% cited slow delivery. [1]

  3. Evaluate recovery flows on retained orders. The USD 6.77 email-cart benchmark is attributed revenue per recipient, before the costs and refunds in your own business. [6]

Key facts at a glance

  • Average abandonment across 50 studies

    70.22%

    was the average abandonment rate across 50 published studies.

    Pooled 50-study rate; mixed years and methods

    Baymard Institute
  • Shoppers citing high extra costs

    40%

    cited high extra costs as an abandonment reason.

    2026 page; US reason survey, not pooled carts

    Baymard Institute
  • Attributed cart-email revenue per recipient

    $6.77

    was average email abandoned-cart revenue per recipient.

    2026 report; attributed revenue, dates unspecified

    Klaviyo
  • Shoppers citing slow delivery

    20%

    cited slow delivery.

    2026 page; US reported checkout reason

    Baymard Institute
  • Shoppers citing account creation

    18%

    cited being required to create an account.

    2026 page; US reported checkout reason

    Baymard Institute
  • Shoppers browsing without buying intent

    42%

    of US online shoppers reported abandoning because they were browsing or not ready to buy.

    2026 page; US shoppers, three-month recall

    Baymard Institute

Abandonment and checkout quality

70.22% was the average abandonment rate across 50 published studies. [1]

The studies cover different years, markets and methods.

67% of benchmarked sites omitted a total-order-cost estimate near the buy section. [2]

A product-page information gap. It does not mean 67% of shoppers abandoned.

65% of benchmarked checkout flows scored mediocre or worse. [3]

344 leading US/EU sites in Baymard’s public checkout benchmark. This is site prevalence, not the proportion of shoppers who abandoned.

Why shoppers leave

40% cited high extra costs as an abandonment reason. [1]

Baymard’s checkout-reason survey excludes the just-browsing segment.

20% cited slow delivery. [1]

A survey reason does not quantify the sales recovered by faster shipping.

18% cited being required to create an account. [1]

Check the actual guest-checkout path before changing campaign messaging.

62% said they would abandon without their preferred payment method. [4]

DHL’s 2026 global preference question differs from Baymard’s past-behavior question.

81% said they would abandon without their preferred delivery option. [5]

A stated shopper intention from 2025, not the observed abandonment rate.

79% said they would leave if returns did not meet expectations. [5]

Different survey and question from Baymard’s checkout-reason percentages.

Recovery-flow revenue

$6.77 was average email abandoned-cart revenue per recipient. [6]

Vendor-attributed flow revenue. Recipients are reachable identified shoppers, not every abandoned cart.

$13.70 was email abandoned-cart revenue per recipient among the top 10% of brands. [6]

Selected upper performance group in the same dataset, not an expected result for a new store.

$4.48 was average text-message abandoned-cart revenue per recipient. [6]

Different channel audience and costs from email. The public article does not disclose the attribution window.

Browsing intent and checkout complexity

42% of US online shoppers reported abandoning because they were browsing or not ready to buy. [7]

Recall covers the preceding three months. This is a respondent reason, not 42% of all abandoned carts or a quantity to subtract from pooled abandonment.

17% reported abandoning an order because checkout was too long or complicated. [7]

Recall covers the preceding quarter. It identifies reported friction, not the conversion lift achievable by removing a particular field.

Reported checkout abandonment reasons. Extra costs too high: 40%. Delivery too slow: 20%. Account required: 18%. Excludes shoppers who were just browsing. Reasons can overlap; this is not the 50-study abandonment average.
Source: Baymard Institute.

Calculate one defined cart rate

Cart abandonment rate = abandoned eligible carts / eligible carts created × 100. Count distinct carts, rather than item additions. For your own report, define an abandoned cart as an eligible cart without a linked qualifying completed order by the end of its follow-up window.

Choose a cart identifier, a cart-creation period and a fixed time allowed for completion after creation. State when a changed or restored cart becomes a new cart. Compare cohorts only after each has completed that follow-up. Apply the same bot and test exclusions throughout; if there are no eligible carts, leave the rate unavailable.

Keep cart and checkout denominators separate

Shopify distinguishes adding an item from starting checkout. Use the working definitions below to keep those stages separate, and record how each cart or checkout links to an order. A reminder flow has another denominator: people eligible to receive that message.

Choose the completion event consistently, including how cancelled or refunded orders affect it. These operating definitions need not match the native report in your platform, so reconcile its event rules before comparing rates.

MeasureDenominatorCompletion check
Cart abandonmentDistinct eligible carts created in the cohortLinked qualifying order within the cart follow-up window
Checkout abandonmentDistinct eligible checkouts started in the cohortLinked qualifying order within the checkout follow-up window
Reminder order rateEligible recipients of the selected reminderAttributed order under the stated message window

Fix the failed step before increasing reminders

Inspect total cost, delivery timing, payment availability and guest checkout before expanding recovery messages. Check that the cart shows the selected variant and makes bundles clear. A browsing shopper and a shopper blocked by a reproducible payment error need different interventions.

Use the reason evidence to prioritize investigation. Its percentages cannot be subtracted from the pooled abandonment rate because their denominators differ. Test the affected step against a comparable eligible cohort and report qualifying completed orders with the same cancellation and refund rules.

Investigate the friction your funnel actually records

Baymard’s extra-cost finding points to a cost-visibility test, not an image test. Compare the current experience with a clear total-cost estimate near the product’s buying controls for destinations where costs can be calculated. Preserve the product, offer and payment choices.

Link distinct cart IDs to checkout starts and qualifying orders. Keep initial completion and later retained orders as separate outcomes, so refunds do not silently change the purchase event. A gallery correction belongs in a separate test when the selected color, bundle contents or product detail is the observed problem.

Recorded issueChange to investigateOutcome to follow
Unexpected delivery or extra chargeShow a calculable order-cost estimate before checkoutCompleted orders per eligible cart and retained contribution
Required account or repeated sign-inVerify guest checkout and account-recovery behaviorSuccessful checkout completion among affected entrants
Wrong color or unclear bundle in cartCorrect variant mapping or the relevant product viewItem-mismatch contacts and returns, alongside orders

FAQ

Questions about the research

Baymard’s pooled estimate is 70.22% across 50 published studies. That combined reference does not mean seven in ten carts can be recovered. Diagnose cost, delivery, payment and account friction first, then measure reminders among eligible identified shoppers separately from the total cart population.

Baymard Institute

Sources and method

  1. Baymard Institute: Cart abandonment research

    baymard.com

    Study details

    2026 page; mixed-year studies

    50-study aggregate plus separate US checkout-reason survey. Different denominators.

    Return
  2. Baymard Institute: Product Page UX 2026: 10 Pitfalls and Best Practices

    baymard.com

    Study details

    March 2026 benchmark update

    155+ benchmarked sites and 30,000+ manually reviewed product-page UX scores. Site prevalence, not shopper conversion.

    Return
  3. Baymard Institute: Cart and checkout usability benchmark

    baymard.com

    Study details

    Public benchmark checked October 18, 2026

    Checkout assessment of 344 leading US/EU ecommerce sites; site UX scores are not customer abandonment rates. The page’s aggregate abandonment headline differs from Baymard’s separate current study list, so that older headline is not used.

    Return
  4. DHL: E-Commerce Trends Report 2026

    group.dhl.com

    Study details

    June 2026 release

    29,000 shoppers and 5,800 businesses across 29 countries. Survey responses.

    Return
  5. DHL: E-Commerce Trends Report 2025

    group.dhl.com

    Study details

    February-March 2025

    24,000 recent online shoppers across 24 markets. Survey responses.

    Return
  6. Klaviyo: The abandoned cart benchmarks report: 2026 data to inform your strategy

    klaviyo.com

    Study details

    October 2, 2026 publication

    Analysis of more than 110,000 Klaviyo customers across industries. Average and top-decile brand flow metrics are distinct. Public article does not specify exact collection dates, per-flow sample counts or attribution windows. Revenue per recipient is vendor-attributed revenue, not incremental recovery or profit.

    Return
  7. Baymard Institute: Reasons for cart abandonment

    baymard.com

    Study details

    Reasons section labelled 2026; page also retains older update metadata

    US online shoppers reporting abandonment in the preceding three months. Current public article does not disclose exact fieldwork dates or sample size for these two questions. Reasons can overlap. This page retains an older pooled-abandonment headline; that headline is not used here.

    Return
  8. Shopify: How To Reduce Shopping Cart Abandonment (2026)

    shopify.com

    Study details

    2026 guide, checked October 19, 2026

    Official explanation of cart abandonment, checkout abandonment and abandoned carts divided by carts created. Used for metric definitions. Cart identity, qualifying orders and follow-up windows must be specified separately when applying the formula.

  9. Gordon and coauthors / INFORMS: A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement

    pubsonline.informs.org

    Study details

    2019 publication

    15 US Facebook randomized advertising experiments; 500 million user-experiment observations, not unique people. Compares observational estimates with experimental effects, not a present-day channel CPA benchmark.

How this report uses research

This report is an editorial synthesis by Fotogenic AI, updated on October 19, 2026. Source dates describe the underlying evidence. Survey responses, measured activity and forecasts are identified separately. Findings are not combined into a new market average. Multiple pages describing one study are treated as one evidence family.

Create with Fotogenic AI

Keep the product clear from gallery to cart

Use Fotogenic AI for the product scenes your gallery needs, then check that the selected variant and bundle contents remain clear in the cart.

Dark-haired model in an ice-blue satin bomber seated on a steel bench against a cobalt wall.